
Motor Accident Claims | Supreme Court To Examine If Appeal Pre-Deposit Conditions Can Be Higher Than Limit Prescribed Under MV Act
Live LawThe Supreme Court is set to consider the legal issue whether the Courts could demand a deposit amount beyond the statutory limit for entertaining appeals against claims awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The bench of Justices CT Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol was hearing a challenge to the order of the Delhi High Court which imposed a condition of 50% of the compensation award as a. A question of seminal importance in the case on hand as to whether an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 could be entertained on deposit of Rs.25,000/- or 50% of the amount awarded, whichever is less and whether the Courts could insist for deposit of amount which is higher than the statutory prescribed amount as a condition precedent for entertaining such an appeal?" However, the Court imposed a deposit condition higher than the statutory limit prescribed under S. 173 of the MV Act, 1988.
History of this topic

Motor Accident Compensation | Supreme Court To Reconsider Judgment Barring Claim Under S.163A MV Act After Dismissal S.166 Claim
Live Law![[MV Act] Gauhati HC Sets Aside MACT Order Which Dismissed Claim For Being Barred U/S 166(3), Says Accident Occured Before Section Was Inserted](/static/images/error.jpg)
[MV Act] Gauhati HC Sets Aside MACT Order Which Dismissed Claim For Being Barred U/S 166(3), Says Accident Occured Before Section Was Inserted
Live Law
MV Act | Supreme Court To Hear Plea Challenging 6 Months Limitation To File Motor Accident Compensation Claims
Live Law
Rigid Constraints Of Formal Pleadings Need Not Be Strictly Adhered To In A Claim Plea Under Motor Vehicles Act: J&K High Court
Live Law
MV Act | Award Can Be Stayed Even If Insurer's Application For Condonation Of Delay In Filing Appeal Is Pending: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Pulls Up States and High Courts For Not Filing Compliance Report On Directions Issued On Motor Accident Compensation Claims
Live Law
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: All India High Courts Cases 2022
Live Law
Kerala High Court Interprets Meaning Of 'Month' For Ascertaining Limitation Period Of Claim Petitions Under MV Act
Live Law
Right To Appeal Accrues On Date Of Institution Of Suit: Madras HC Entertains Appeal Arising Out Of Claim Filed Prior To Motor Vehicle Amendment Act
Live Law
Limitation Period For Filing Motor Accidents Claim Applicable Only Prospectively From April 1, 2022 : Kerala High Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Quarterly Digest 2022 - MOTOR ACCIDENT CASES (Jan- Mar)
Live Law
Legal Representatives Entitled To Motor Accident Claim: Delhi HC Upholds Compensation Given To Children From Deceased's First Marriage
Live Law
Supreme Court Recommends Constitution Of Motor Vehicle Appellate Tribunals In View Of Large Pendency In High Courts
Live Law
Motor Accident Claim Petition Does Not Abate On Death Of Injured Claimant: Supreme Court
Live Law
Special Scheme For Motor Accident Claims- Delhi High Court To Consider Functioning Of Special Committees, Financial & Infrastructure Concerns
Live Law
Supreme Court To Examine Methods To Expedite Compensation In Motor Accident Cases
Live Law
No Limitation Period For Filing Motor Accident Claim Petition; Amendment Introducing Six Months Cap Yet To Be Notified, Clarifies Allahabad High Court
Live Law![Can Motor Accident Claim Petition Be Entertained At The Place Of Claimant's Residence? SC To Examine [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Can Motor Accident Claim Petition Be Entertained At The Place Of Claimant's Residence? SC To Examine [Read Order]
Live Law
Kerala High Court grants complete stay of NGT order on ban and usage of diesel vehicles above 10 years
Live Law
Kerala High Court grants complete stay of NGT order on ban and usage of diesel vehicles above 10 years
Live LawDiscover Related










![Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: February 2025 [Citations 119- 251]](/static/images/error.jpg)





















![[Arbitration Act] Limitation Does Not Stop If Initial Filing Is Non Est, Date Of Filing Must Be Reckoned From Date Of Refiling: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)




![[CGST ACT] Dept Can't Seize Goods If Quantity Or Weight Of Goods Is Found Correct On Physical Verification: Calcutta High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)


![[S.292B Income Tax Act] Inadvertent Mistakes In Reassessment Can Be Saved But Assessment Order Overlooking Apparent Error Cannot: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)




