Four-day work week means more free time — but that doesn't guarantee you can put your feet up
ABC"We should work to live, not live to work," declared Britain's shadow chancellor John McDonnell last month, as he announced the British Labour Party would reduce the standard working week to 32 hours, without loss of pay, within 10 years of winning office. Reducing working time — the time one has to work to keep 'body and soul alive' — is thus a valuable ethical objective." Mr Skidelsky's argument for the ethical desirability of working fewer hours is essentially this: people are generally happier when spending time on what they want to do, rather than on what they have to do to earn an income less time spent on work, and more free time, will thus promote happiness promoting happiness is ethically desirable, so it is ethically desirable to reduce the number of hours a person has to work. The issue of distribution There is an argument shorter working hours are ethically compelling for precisely this reason: they correct an injustice arising from the unequal distribution of free time. Men enjoy a larger share of socially available free time, because women spend more time outside paid work on duties related to child rearing and care giving.