Stay orders of High Courts will not automatically lapse after six months: SC
The HinduThe Supreme Court on February 29 said it could not unnecessarily fiddle with well-thought-out interim orders of High Courts staying criminal and civil proceedings. Chandrachud said the apex court had no power whatsoever to declare that a stay order passed by a High Court after due application of mind would automatically expire within six months. “Putting such constraints on the power of the High Court will also amount to making a dent on the jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution, which is an essential feature that forms part of the basic structure of the Constitution,” Justice A.S. Oka, who authored the lead opinion, held. The five-judge Bench, in its verdict, further clarified that the apex court cannot “normally” fix time bound schedules for High Courts or trial courts to dispose of pending cases. The Bench highlighted that the top court’s seemingly invincible power under Article 142 of the Constitution to do “complete justice” did not extend to excessive interference in orders passed by High Courts after due consideration.