Delaware judge rejects Elon Musk’s second bid to ram through $56bn pay package
The IndependentThe latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy policy A Delaware judge has rejected Tesla's bid to ram through a humongous pay package for its CEO Elon Musk after striking it down once already earlier this year. Judge Kathleen McCormick ruled in January that the proposed $56bn bonanza originally offered by Tesla's board had violated shareholders' rights because the entire "negotiation" process was effectively controlled by Musk. McCormick also rejected an equally massive and unprecedented bid by the plaintiff's lawyers to receive their legal fees in the form of $5.6bn in Tesla stock, which McCormick described as "a bold ask". Musk agreed, declaring that "shareholders should control company votes, not judges" while sharing a social media post by investor Cathie Wood that lambasted McCormick as an "activist judge".