Expenses Towards Advertisement, Brokerage And Commission, Incurred By A Real Estate Developer; Deductible As Revenue Expenditure: Delhi High Court
Live LawThe Delhi High Court has ruled that The bench of Justices Manmohan and Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora observed that the dispute involving the year of deduction, which was sought to be postponed by the revenue department, was revenue neutral, having no tax affect and that it did not put the revenue department at any disadvantageous position. The Court noted that the lower authorities had concluded that the said expenses incurred by the assessee could not be assigned to a specific asset and that they must be allowed as revenue expenditure in conformity with the applicable Accounting Standard. While holding that the expenses incurred by the assessee were indirect costs incurred by it towards the development of its real estate business, the High Court rejected the contention of the revenue department that since the expenses were of an 'enduring nature', therefore, they must be capitalized to the cost of the project. The Revenue does not dispute that these expenses are not a direct cost of the specific project but are indirect costs incurred by the Assessee for development of its real estate business. Ruling that the said expenses were in the nature of general administration cost and selling cost, as classified by the Guidance Note issued by ICAI, the High Court held that since the expenses were incurred by the assessee for its business, they qualified for deduction as revenue expenditure.