Discrepancies Between FIR And Subsequent Statement Under Section 164 CrPC Not A Ground For Discharge : Supreme Court
Live LawThe Supreme Court observed that discrepancies between the FIR and any subsequent statement under Section 164 of the CrPC cannot be a ground for discharge without initiation of trial.Such discrepancies may be a defence during the trial, the bench comprising Justices Indira Banerjee and JK Maheshwari noted.In this case, a charge sheet was filed implicating the accused under various sections of. The Supreme Court observed that discrepancies between the FIR and any subsequent statement under Section 164 of the CrPC cannot be a ground for discharge without initiation of trial. "Discrepancies between the FIR and any subsequent statement under Section 164 of the CrPC may be a defence. Case name: Hazrat Deen vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 134 Case no.| date: SLP 9552/2021 | 6 Jan 2022 Coram: Justices Indira Banerjee and JK Maheshwari Counsel: Sr. Adv S.G.Hasnain, AOR Aftab Ali Khan