Inter Se Seniority Of Direct Recruits And Promotees In A Particular Service Has To Be Determined As Per The Service Rules : Supreme Court
2 years, 4 months ago

Inter Se Seniority Of Direct Recruits And Promotees In A Particular Service Has To Be Determined As Per The Service Rules : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that inter se seniority of direct recruits and promotees in a particular service has to be determined as per the service rules.The writ petitioners before the Allahabad High Court were initially appointed as Consolidators in the Consolidation Department in various districts. The Supreme Court observed that inter se seniority of direct recruits and promotees in a particular service has to be determined as per the service rules. While upholding the High Court judgment, the bench further observed: When the 1992 Rules specifically emphasized that, where in any year of recruitment, appointments were to be made both by direct recruitment and by promotion, regular appointments could not have been made unless selections were made from both the sources and a combined list was to be prepared in accordance with Rule 18 of the 1992 Rules, the seniority list dated 29th July 2005, which provided a higher seniority to the direct recruits, is, for the aforesaid reasons, not sustainable in law. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Jayant Mohan, AOR Headnotes Service Law - Uttar Pradesh Revenue Consolidation Service Rules, 1992 - Inter se seniority of direct recruits and promotees in a particular service has to be determined as per the service rules -When the 1992 Rules specifically emphasized that, where in any year of recruitment, appointments were to be made both by direct recruitment and by promotion, regular appointments could not have been made unless selections were made from both the sources and a combined list was to be prepared in accordance with Rule 18 of the 1992 Rules - The seniority list which provided a higher seniority to the direct recruits is not sustainable in law.

Court Service Inter Se Adv Recruits 1992 Direct Recruitment Inter Se Seniority Promotees Direct Recruits Seniority Rules Inter Se Seniority Of Direct Recruits And Promotees In A Particular Service  mr  court  promotees  particular  seniority  rules  recruits  inter  se  service  direct  recruitment  1992  adv  supreme

History of this topic

Fixation Of Seniority Between Direct Recruitment Employees And Promoted Employees
3 years, 9 months ago

Fixation Of Seniority Between Direct Recruitment Employees And Promoted Employees

Live Law  

The issue relating to ascertaining the seniority in a post where employees are appointed both through direct recruitment and promotion from feeder post has evolved by a series of precedents. The Supreme Court in N R Parmar had held that the date to be reckoned for placing a direct recruitment employee in the seniority list would be the date on …

Date Of Joining Irrelevant In Fixing Seniority Of Direct Recruits; SC Recasts Seniority List Of Punjab Judicial Officers [Read Judgment]
6 years, 5 months ago

Date Of Joining Irrelevant In Fixing Seniority Of Direct Recruits; SC Recasts Seniority List Of Punjab Judicial Officers [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

It was held that the date of joining would not be a relevant factor for determining seniority of direct recruits. It would suffice if action has been initiated for direct recruit vacancies, within the recruitment year in which the vacancies had become availableThe Supreme Court has recast the seniority list of Punjab Superior Judicial Officers by acting on an appeal …

Date Of Joining Irrelevant In Fixing Seniority Of Direct Recruits; SC Recasts Seniority List Of Punjab Judicial Officers [Read Judgment]
6 years, 5 months ago

Date Of Joining Irrelevant In Fixing Seniority Of Direct Recruits; SC Recasts Seniority List Of Punjab Judicial Officers [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

It was held that the date of joining would not be a relevant factor for determining seniority of direct recruits. It would suffice if action has been initiated for direct recruit vacancies, within the recruitment year in which the vacancies had become availableThe Supreme Court has recast the seniority list of Punjab Superior Judicial Officers by acting on an appeal …

UP Higher Judicial Service Promotees Can’t Be Given Promotion Without Suitability Test: SC [Read Judgment]
6 years, 11 months ago

UP Higher Judicial Service Promotees Can’t Be Given Promotion Without Suitability Test: SC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

In a judgment rendered on Wednesday, the Supreme Court bench of Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Justice Rohinton Nariman asserted that promotees recruited to the UP Higher Judicial Services in the year 2008/2009 are not entitled to seniority prior to their appointment on the ground that the requirement of suitability test was introduced for the first time in the year …

Inter-departmental seniority & Promotional rights – length of service does not mean seniority inter se; Railways to prepare groupwise-gradewise seniority lists :SC
10 years, 1 month ago

Inter-departmental seniority & Promotional rights – length of service does not mean seniority inter se; Railways to prepare groupwise-gradewise seniority lists :SC

Live Law  

Dealing with a bunch of matters filed by the Union of India relating to a common question of law surrounding inter departmental seniority lists and right to promotion, a 2 judge bench of the Supreme Court upheld the appeals and set aside the impugned Kerala HC judgment affirming CAT's order directing Railways to promote the appellants.The bench comprising of Justices …

Discover Related