Consumer Complaints By ‘Subsequent Transferee’ Of Flats Not Always Barred, Clarifies SC [Read Judgment]
‘The decision of this Court in Haryana Urban Development Authority cannot be stretched to say that in every case where there is a transfer, the complaint by the subsequent transferee would not be maintainable at all. “The Supreme Court has held that consumer complaints by ‘subsequent transferee’ of flats are not always barred.The bench comprising Justice Uday Umesh Lalit. The bench comprising Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice R. Subhash Reddy in CCI Projects Ltd. vs. Vrajendra Jogjivandas Thakkar clarified that the decision in Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Raje Ram cannot be stretched to say that in every case where there is a transfer, the complaint by the subsequent transferee would not be maintainable at all. The decision of this Court in Haryana Urban Development Authority cannot be stretched to say that in every case where there is a transfer, the complaint by the subsequent transferee would not be maintainable at all.” The bench disposed the appeal by modifying the quantum of compensation by reducing it to 5 Lakhs observing that some delay in handing over possession stood explained.

![Punjab & Haryana HC Slams Govt For Not Executing Orders In Time [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
![Punjab & Haryana HC Slams Govt For Not Executing Orders In Time [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Discover Related

Builder Gets Four-Month Jail for Defaulting on Penalty

Kerala HC orders to attach properties of banned PFI to recover hartal damages

ED action on state-run liquor retailer: TN, TASMAC withdraw transfer pleas in SC

Sushant Singh Rajput closure report: CBI seeks case transfer, next hearing in July

Telangana HC grants interim stay on LPG customer transfer policy

MUDA case: Special court to hear ED’s plea on closure report on April 8

Court pulls up CBI for ‘fabricating evidence’ in justice Yadav case

Don’t assign judicial work to new judge, lawyers tell Calcutta high court

Flat sale clauses can’t justify delay in conveyance: HC

Calcutta HC lawyers may stop work to protest Delhi HC judge’s transfer

₹2.58 lakh-crore appropriation bill cleared by Haryana assembly

HC summons all Punjab DCs, SSPs over delay in handing over land to NHAI
