Supreme Court Quashes S.498A IPC Case Filed By Wife Against Parents-in-Law 'With Ulterior Motive' To Force Husband To Consent For Divorce
Live LawThe Supreme Court today quashed a domestic cruelty case under Section 498A IPC against the husband's parents which was registered with an ulterior motive by the daughter-in-law to force their son to consent to divorce. The bench comprising Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan was hearing the Appellant's challenge to the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad Bench decision which refused to quash the criminal case against the Appellants. Setting aside the High Court's decision, the judgment authored by Justice Gavai emphasized that a mere allegation of cruelty would not be an offence unless such cruelty was “done with the intention to cause grave injury or drive the victim to commit suicide or inflict grave injury to herself.” The Court observed that the allegations against the appellants were vague and omnibus, lacking specific details of instances of cruelty or misconduct. Case Title: DIGAMBAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Citation : 2024 LiveLaw 1025 Related Reports: S.498A IPC : How Supreme Court Raised Concerns About Misuse Of Anti-Dowry & Cruelty Laws Over Years S.498A IPC Often Used Against Husband & His Family To Meet Wife's Unreasonable Demands, Growing Tendency Of Misuse: Supreme Court S.498A IPC | Ensure Husband's Distant Relatives Aren't Over-Implicated In Exaggerated Cases : Supreme Court Cautions Courts Merely Because Wife Didn't File Complaint Under S.498A IPC For Many Years Doesn't Mean There Was No Cruelty By Husband : Supreme Court 'Abuse Of Criminal Process, Vague Allegations' : Supreme Court Quashes Wife's S.498A Case Against In-Laws