
Only Chief Secretary/ Administrative Reforms Dept Can Direct Joint Inquiry Against Delinquents From Different Departments: Rajasthan HC
Live LawIn a case where two officers governed by two different departments and disciplinary authorities are booked by only one taking disciplinary action, the Jodhpur bench of the Rajasthan High Court said that in such a case only the Chief Secretary/competent authority of Administrative Reforms and Coordination Department can direct a joint inquiry under the relevant rules. For context, Rule 18 of Rajasthan Civil Services Rules provides for a joint inquiry–where two or more Government Servants are concerned in any case, the Government or any other authority competent to impose the penalty of dismissal from service on all such Government Servants may make an order directing that disciplinary action against all of them may be taken in a common proceedings. In the cases like the one in hands, when two delinquents whose disciplinary authorities are officers or Secretaries of different departments, then, it is the Chief Secretary or other competatnt authority of the Administrative Reforms and Coordination Department alone, who can pass an order under Rule 18 of CCA Rules, 1958" The court further hastened to add that the manner in which the "simple chargesheet" was issued in the present case was not sufficient. It further said that the petitioner's disciplinary authority in the Finance Department shall be free to recommend disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner or the Chief Secretary or the Secretary in-charge of the Administrative Reforms and Co-ordination Department shall suo-motu pass an order under Rule 18 of the CCA Rules, 1958, appointing common disciplinary authority.
History of this topic

Court Cannot Act As Disciplinary Authority To Decide Correctness Of Allegations Against Delinquent Employee: Rajasthan HC
Live Law
No Hearing Given: Rajasthan HC Quashes Trial Court Order Making Adverse Remarks Against Circle Officer For Alleged Negligence In Probe
Live Law
Panchayati Raj Department Can Accord Post-Facto Consent For Transfers But Employees With Extenuating Situations Must Be Heard: Rajasthan HC
Live Law
Seem To Be Passed In Great Haste: Rajasthan HC Tells State To Decide Afresh On Transfer Of 1116 Accounts Officers Ensuring Non-Arbitrariness
Live Law
Rajasthan Civil Services Rules | Apprehension Of Inquiry Taking Long Time Not Ground To Ward Off Disciplinary Inquiry U/S 19: High Court
Live Law
Preposterous To Assume Judges Can't Commit Mistake While Passing Orders: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Compulsory Retirement Of ADJ After 9 Yrs
Live Law
Enquiry Officer Acting As Prosecutor And Leading Examination-In-Chief Vitiates Departmental Enquiry: Rajasthan High Court Reiterates
Live Law
Quasi-Judicial Authority Can’t Pass Non-Speaking Orders: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Punishment Imposed On Constable Allegedly Found Intoxicated On Duty
Live Law
Corruption By Public Servants A ‘Gigantic Problem’, Eroding Confidence Of Common Man In Governance: Rajasthan High Court
Live Law
Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act -Prior Approval Of Director Of Education Required To Remove Employee : Supreme Court
Live Law
Can't prosecute govt servants without sanction: Rajasthan brings law
Deccan Chronicle![SC Lets Rajasthan HC To Continue Disciplinary Proceedings Against Judicial Officer For Disobeying Precedents [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
SC Lets Rajasthan HC To Continue Disciplinary Proceedings Against Judicial Officer For Disobeying Precedents [Read Order]
Live Law
HC orders sealing of Rajasthan Cricket Association office | IndiaTV News
India TV NewsDiscover Related





































![Punjab & Haryana High Court Weekly Round-Up [March 03-March 09, 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)









