Karnataka High Court Weekly Round Up: July 25 To July 31 ,2022
Live LawNominal Index: B M MUNIRAJU v. THE JAIL SUPERINTENDENT. Person Convicted For Minor Offences Under NI Act Entitled To "Lenient" Consideration Of Parole Application: Karnataka High Court Case Title: B M MUNIRAJU v. THE JAIL SUPERINTENDENT Case No: WRIT PETITION NO.7387/2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 283 The Karnataka High Court has directed the Jail Superintendent of the Central Prison at Bengaluru to consider a parole application filed by an accused convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking to arrange 50% of the disputed amount for depositing with the Supreme Court Registry in connection with an appeal against conviction pending before it. Karnataka High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Protection For Justice HP Sandesh Who Spoke Of "Transfer Threat" Case Title: Ramesh Naik.L v. State of Karnataka Case No: WP 14266/2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 284 The Karnataka High Court on Monday dismissed a public interest litigation seeking protection for Justice HP Sandesh, who recently made sensational revelations regarding "transfer threats" for slamming investigations carried out by the Anti-Corruption Bureau in a case allegedly involving Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru. Arbitration Clause Can BeInvoked Against Disputes Under Another Agreement, If Both Agreements Form One Composite Transaction: Karnataka High Court Case Title: M/S Bestpay Solutions Private Limited versus M/S Razorpay Software Private Limited Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 287 The Karnataka High Court has ruled that a party can invoke the Arbitration Clause contained in an agreement with respect to the disputes arising with a third party under another agreement, if both the agreements refer to each other and form one composite transaction. Backlog Of Unfilled WomenSeats In Reserved Category May Be Filled By Male Candidates Of Same Category:High Court Directs Bangalore University Case Title: Dyavappa v Bangalore University & Others Case No: Writ Petition No 6426/2021 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 294 The Karnataka High Court has said that the state government order, providing that in case eligible women applicants under a reserved category post are not available, such posts could be filled up by eligible male candidates of the same category is applicable to recruitment notifications issued under the General Recruitment Rules or recruitment as regards backlog vacancies under the Special Recruitment Rules.