Trump’s Manhattan trial could determine whether rule of law survives: criminologist
Raw StoryNow that the Supreme Court appears to be agreeing, at least in part, with former President Donald Trump in his un-American quest for unlimited presidential impunity, the threat to American democracy just got worse. Until the first criminal trial of Trump began two weeks ago — a case that could have been prosecuted and tried some two years ago according to the account of insider lawyer Mark Pomerantz — the United States was among those nations worldwide that had never charged or prosecuted a former president. Unless one counts the United States v. Jefferson Davis, when former Confederate States of America President Jefferson Davis faced treason, Trump’s criminal trial in Manhattan is unique in presidential history. At this historical moment, what could be the one and only criminal trial of a former president with the full benefits of due process and equal protection under the law has become critical to the very survival of the rule of law in this nation — especially should Trump return to the White House in 2025. Of equal importance, each of the other criminal trials — should they come to fruition, especially before Election Day — will also demonstrate why the former president’s guilt or innocence cannot be left to the majority of the Supreme Court’s justices, three of whom Trump nominated, and a fourth “on the take” justice whose wife is also a MAGA activist.