How sub-quotas queer affirmative-action pitch
Hindustan TimesIt was autumn 1928. Dr Ambedkar championed a view which sees reservations as a social lever, used to level the playing field after centuries of oppression He spoke eloquently of the need for special assistance for the depressed classes, making for the first time a cohesive case for affirmative action and dismantling a string of objections to special quotas on questions of efficiency and merit. The apex court’s recent decision greenlighting the sub-classification of SC/ST quotas and a secondary call emanating from four judges to enforce creamy layer exclusions hold the potential to upend a settled but imperfect compact on affirmative action in India. The demand for local internal quotas emanates from there, but also creates reciprocal anxieties among larger SC groups that political parties will use quotas to exploit fractures in the Dalit communities for first-past-the-post wins. Think of the pandering by parties to dominant groups demanding quotas — either appeasing influential groups like in Maharashtra or Haryana, or holding back survey data to mollify rivalling but powerful groups as in Karnataka — and it is clear why this is a fraught moment.