Punjab And Haryana High Court Relaxes Norm On 'Mandatory Custody' For Suspension Of Sentence In NDPS Cases
Live LawA division bench comprising of Justices M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Sukhvinder Kaur of the Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the norm of undergoing minimum mandatory period of custody of 6 years for consideration of grant of relief of suspension of sentence in cases where there is conscious possession of commercial quantity of contraband RCR 316) is liable to slightly be relaxed by 6 months while maintaining the minimum custody of 15 months after conviction. Therefore, the evidence on record justified their conviction by the Special Court Reliance was placed upon the judgement of the Supreme Court in Budhiyarin Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh 2022 RCR 339 where it was held that no leniency should be shown to accused persons who are found guilty under the NDPS Act and in other cases it has held that period of custody undergone cannot be a criterion to suspend the sentence and grant bail. In view of this additional factor, the bench was of the considered opinion that, "the norm of undergoing minimum mandatory period of custody of 6 years for consideration of grant of relief of suspension of sentence in cases where there is conscious possession of commercial quantity of contraband laid down in the decision of Daler Singh is liable to slightly relaxed by 6 months while maintaining the minimum custody of 15 months after conviction." Allowing the application the bench held, "Since in the instant case the applicant has undergone 5 and a half years of total custody and more than 2 years of custody after conviction, and since the applicant will anyway serve the sentence imposed by the Special Court and undergo the full period of custody if the appeal is dismissed, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the contentions of the parties in the Appeal, this application is allowed and the rest of the sentence imposed on the applicant by the Judge, Special Court, is suspended subject to the applicant furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned."