Ariana Madix aims sly jab at ex Tom Sandoval after he sued her over explicit footage of Rachel Leviss

Ariana Madix aimed a sly jab at her ex Tom Sandoval after he sued her for acquiring explicit footage of his other woman Rachel Leviss. She uploaded a Vanderpump Rules cast picture with an emoji of a championship ribbon reading: 'well done' - strategically placed to completely obscure Sandoval's face Madix dumped Sandoval last March after a nine-year relationship when she discovered he had conducted an affair with Leviss; Madix and Sandoval pictured June 2022 Vanderpump Rules star Scheana Shay has slammed Tom Sandoval on Instagram for suing his ex-girlfriend Ariana Madix over explicit footage of his other woman Rachel Leviss 'Call me a f****ing idiot, okay? Sandoval, 40, alleges that Madix, 39, 'obtained access' to his phone last year and looked at videos on him and Leviss, 29, without his 'authorization or permission' according to court documents obtained by Us Weekly; Leviss seen in April Their Vanderpump Rules co-star Katie Maloney, who recently opened the sandwich shop Something About Her with Madix, also denounced Sandoval's lawsuit Referring to the wording of the lawsuit, Maloney wrote: 'Authorized permission. Madix’s attorney, Jordan Susman, responded to the claims in a statement, telling Us Weekly, 'It is abhorrent that Tom Sandoval continues to torment Ms. Madix'; She is seen in January It comes after Leviss sued Tom and Ariana for 'revenge porn, eavesdropping and invasion of privacy' following last year's Scandoval drama; Seen in 2022 Leviss accused Sandoval of violating California's Revenge Porn law by recording sexually charged sex videos without her permission and keeping them on his phone; They are seen in 2021 Leviss claimed in her suit that it was her former lover who recorded the explicit FaceTime call. The scandal goes back to the season 9 finale of Bravo’s Vanderpump Rules last year, when cameras captured Madix as she discovered explicit footage of Rachel on Tom's phone She also claimed she was lead to believe she was 'contractually barred from speaking out about her mistreatment,' while the rest of the cast benefitted from a huge ratings boost and 'unseen levels of public recognition and professional opportunity,' while Leviss 'suffered in silence.'