‘Royalty is not tax’, says Supreme Court; frees States from Centre’s restrictions on taxing mining lands and quarries.
4 months, 4 weeks ago

‘Royalty is not tax’, says Supreme Court; frees States from Centre’s restrictions on taxing mining lands and quarries.

The Hindu  

A significant judgment delivered in a 8:1 ratio by a nine-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud on July 25 held that the power of State Legislatures to tax mining lands and quarries is not limited by the Parliament’s Mines and Minerals Act of 1957. The majority judgment pronounced by Chief Justice Chandrachud said that State Legislatures derive their power to tax mines and quarries under Article 246 read with Entry 49 in the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The limitations imposed by the Parliament in a law like the MMDR Act, which related to mineral development, did not operate on or influence State taxation of mining lands under Entry 49 in the State List merely for the reason that “there is no specific stipulation in the Constitution to that effect”. “The MMDRA wholly occupies the field and provides for a complete code covering every aspect of ‘regulation’ and ‘development’ of mines and minerals, including any Government exaction/ imposition in relation to mines and minerals thereby necessarily limiting a State Legislature’s competence to impose any other levy beyond what is stipulated under MMDRA and the rules framed thereunder,” he had submitted.

History of this topic

Supreme Court agrees to set up Bench to hear pleas of States on recovery of royalty, tax dues on minerals
3 months, 1 week ago
Supreme court lets mineral-rich states out of resource curse
4 months ago
Mining Tax: Supreme Court declines retrospective application of state tax and royalty on mines
4 months, 1 week ago
States can collect past tax dues on mineral rights, Supreme Court rejects Centre's plea
4 months, 1 week ago
Supreme Court To Clarify Tomorrow Whether Judgement Upholding Powers Of States To Tax Mineral Rights Be Given Only Prospective Effect
4 months, 1 week ago
SC to set conditions on retrospective mineral tax ruling to provide clarity
4 months, 3 weeks ago
Explained: The Supreme Court verdict on states’ right to levy tax on minerals
4 months, 3 weeks ago
Centre opposes Supreme Court plea for mineral royalty refund, cites ‘multipolar’ impact
4 months, 3 weeks ago
SC reserves decision on whether its verdict upholding State’s right to tax mineral rights should apply only prospectively
4 months, 3 weeks ago
SC upholds federalism in mining tax ruling
4 months, 3 weeks ago
Allowing States To Tax Minerals Will Lead To Unhealthy Competition Among Them, Cause Price Rise : Justice Nagarathna In Dissent
4 months, 3 weeks ago
Editorial on SC judgment on taxing mining activities: Fiscal federalism
4 months, 3 weeks ago
SC grants states power to levy taxes on minerals-bearing lands
4 months, 4 weeks ago
Setback to Centre as Supreme Court rules royalty on minerals is not tax
4 months, 4 weeks ago
SC upholds right of States to impose taxes on mines, mineral-bearing lands
4 months, 4 weeks ago
Is Royalty On Mining Leases Tax? What Are States' Powers To Tax Mineral Rights? Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench Reserves Judgment
9 months, 1 week ago
States' Power To Tax Mineral Rights Eclipsed By Union Law On Mineral Development : Harish Salve In Supreme Court [Day 4]
9 months, 2 weeks ago

Discover Related