Right Of Accused To Impeach Witness Testimony Indefeasible, Embargo Under Section 172(3) CrPC Not Applicable: Kerala High Court
Live LawThe Kerala High Court has held that the embargo in Section 172 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not take away the right of the accused to use previous statements of witnesses to impeach their testimonies.Justice K Haripal while allowing the petition, observed as such in light of Section 161 of the CrPC and Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act:".it is the right of every. The Kerala High Court has held that the embargo in Section 172 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not take away the right of the accused to use previous statements of witnesses to impeach their testimonies. Justice K Haripal while allowing the petition, observed as such in light of Section 161 of the CrPC and Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act: ".it is the right of every accused in a criminal trial to make use of the previous statements of a witness including the statements recorded by the investigating agency during the course of investigation for the purpose of establishing contradiction in evidence or to discredit the witness." Thereafter, the petitioner herein filed an application before the Additional Sessions Judge for issuing summons to witnesses, including the DySP in an attempt to impeach the testimony of some of the witnesses However, this was disallowed by the trial court on the premise that no further investigation was conducted by the said DySP and that no such report was made available before the court.