Once Reassessment Framed By AO Is Not Sustainable,Order U/s 263 Seeking To Revise Reassessment Is Not Acceptable: Delhi ITAT
Live LawWhile allowing the appeal of assessee in respect of the fact that whether the PCIT had validly assumed his revision jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, both in law and on facts, the New Delhi ITAT held that the PCIT erred in assumption of jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Bench of the ITAT comprising of Saktijit Dey and M. Balaganesh observed that, “ Once, the reassessment order per se framed by the AO is not sustainable in the eyes of law, any revision order passed thereon u/s 263 seeking to revise such unsustainable order cannot be accepted in the eyes of law and consequential revision order also passed u/s 263 of the Act deserves to be quashed.” The Bench reiterated while referring to the decision of Delhi Tribunal in the case of Sh. Thus, the Commissioner of Income Tax could not have exercised jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act.” As per the brief facts of the case, the assessee's case was reopened. This reassessment was sought to be revised by the PCIT by invoking his revision jurisdiction u/s 263 on the issue of capital gains, investment of Rs.5,50,000/- in time deposits with the Axis Bank and deduction u/s 54 on the ground that the AO had not made enquiries on the same thereby making his order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.