Basic Structure Doctrine Is Here To Stay, It Has Been Embraced By Other Countries Too : Senior Advocate Fali S Nariman
Live LawThe basic structure doctrine has achieved constitutional permanence not only in India, but also in six other nations globally that have both acknowledged and embraced the principle of placing a restraint on the legislative power of constitutional amendment, renowned Indian lawyer Fali S Nariman, Senior Advocate, said on Friday. On the panel debating whether the basic structure doctrine has served the nation well were Nariman, former Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Thuglak editor S Gurumurthy, and senior Supreme Court lawyer Shyam Divan. Nariman insisted that this declaration, coming in the wake of the lifting of the internal emergency imposed by the Indira Gandhi-led government in June 1975, was an essential recognition of the basic structure doctrine by the legislature itself – “After the lifting of the oppressive internal emergency imposed in 1975, and after the sixth general election of March 1977, India’s newly constituted Parliament met and expressly declared by Section 40 of the Constitution Amendment Act, 1978 that the right to move any court for the enforcement of rights conferred by Articles 20 and 21 even during the period of an emergency can never be suspended. To offer a contextual perspective on the frequency with which the apex court has invoked this doctrine, Nariman also highlighted the number of times the Constitution has been amended since 1950 – “Since 1950, we have had 105 Constitutional Amendment acts under Article 368, in which 60 new articles were inserted in the Constitution, 17 originally enacted articles have been removed, and 154 originally enacted articles have been substituted or amended.” Whenever the basic structure doctrine has been invoked by the Supreme Court to strike down a constitutional amendment, it has always been on the principle of good judicial governance, and not ‘interfering’ judicial governance, the senior lawyer asserted. The court held that in excluding all judicial review over any constitutional amendment, there was a violation of the basic structure doctrine.” On veteran lawyer Ram Jethmalani, in whose honour the eponymous lecture series was organised, Nariman said at the outset of his speech – “In life, one has to be fortunate in one’s given name.