SC-ST Act | Victim's Presence When Insulting Remarks Are Made Includes "Online Presence": Kerala HC Denies Pre-Arrest Bail To YouTuber
Live LawThe Kerala High Court on Tuesday denied pre-arrest bail to a YouTuber who allegedly insulted a woman belonging to a Scheduled Tribe through an interview published on social media on the ground that a prima facie case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act was made out against him. Public Prosecutor Noushad K. A submitted that the benefit of pre-arrest bail cannot be granted to the petitioner in the present case since pre-arrest bail can be granted to an accused only when a prima facie case under the Act is not made out. "Thus, the words used by the petitioner in the interview are prima facie insulting, humiliating and abusive, made with the knowledge that the victim belongs to a Scheduled Tribe community. "In the light of the above circumstances, I am of the view that though bailable offences alone are alleged against the petitioner under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and non-bailable offence under the Information Technology Act, 2000, since the offences alleged under section 3 and section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989 cannot be said to be not made out, this application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable."