
Change In Tax Rate In Future AYs Not Ground For Reassessment Without Fulfilling Jurisdictional Parameters U/S 148 Income Tax Act: Bombay HC
Live LawThe Bombay High Court has made it clear that merely because the tax rate which is applicable on an assessee changes in future assessment years, is not a ground to initiate reassessment action against it for previous AYs, unless the 'jurisdictional parameters' of Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are fulfilled. A division bench of Justices MS Sonak and Jitendra Jain thus quashed the reassessment order passed against Oxford University Press, merely because its tax status was changed from 'resident' to 'non-resident', making it subject to a 40% tax rate instead of 30%. It said, “Merely because there is some change in the tax rate for the future assessment years, the provisions of Section 148 cannot be invoked without the jurisdictional parameters of these Sections being fulfilled.” The reassessment action was initiated in March 2021, more than four years after the end of the relevant assessment year. Moreover, it noted that changes in applicable tax rate do not answer non-compliance with the jurisdictional parameter that the assessee should have failed to fully and truly disclose the material facts necessary for assessment since the reassessment was proposed beyond four years.
History of this topic

Income Tax | Whether There Was Proper Notice Or Not Is Disputed Question Of Fact, Can't Be Challenged Under Article 226: Kerala High Court
Live Law
AO Duty Bound To Dispose Of Assessee's Written Objections To Proposed Re-Assessment By Passing Speaking Order: Calcutta High Court
Live Law
What Is The Time Period Surviving U/S 149 Of Income Tax Act For Issuing Reassessment Notices: Delhi High Court Explains
Live Law
Suo Moto Disallowance Made By Assessee Under Bonafide Belief Of Tax Liability Can Be Rectified U/S 264 Of Income Tax Act Without Amending ITR: Delhi HC
Live Law
Suo Moto Disallowance Made By Assessee Under Bonafide Belief Of Tax Liability Can Be Rectified U/S 264 Of Income Tax Act Without Amending ITR: Delhi HC
Live Law
Tax Weekly Round-Up: January 20 - January 26, 2025
Live Law![[Income Tax] Assessing Officer Not Only An Adjudicator But Also An Investigator, Cannot Remain Oblivious To Claim Without Enquiry: Kerala HC](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2023/12/09/508941-kerala-high-court-01.jpg)
[Income Tax] Assessing Officer Not Only An Adjudicator But Also An Investigator, Cannot Remain Oblivious To Claim Without Enquiry: Kerala HC
Live Law
ITAT Cannot Decide On Grounds Not Addressed By Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals): Delhi High Court
Live Law
Reassessment U/S 150 Of Income Tax Act Can't Be Initiated On Mere 'Incidental' Findings Of Appellate Authority: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Missed income tax section 87A rebate? Here's your chance to claim it for FY 2023-24
India Today
Belated Filing Of Form 9A Is Not Attributable To Trust: Bombay HC Allows Exemption U/S 11 After Condoning Delay Under IT Act
Live Law
SC's Judgement In Abhisar Buildwell Case Doesn't Permit Reopening Of Assessments Beyond Limitation Period U/S 149(1) Of IT Act: Delhi HC
Live Law
Recourse To Section 147 Of Income Tax Act Not Barred In Cases Where Assessing Officer Is Empowered To Proceed U/S 153C: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Rajasthan High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment As Income Tax Dept. Failed To Hold Proper Investigation
Live Law
Mistake In Calculation Of Tax As Per Sec 115BBE Can Be Rectified U/s 154 And Not U/s 263: Ahmedabad ITAT Quashes Revision Made By PCIT
Live Law
JAO Cease To Have Jurisdiction To Issue Reassessment Notice Outside Faceless Assessment: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Reassessment Notice Not Complying Section 148 Pre-Conditions Is Beyond Jurisdictional: Bombay High Court
Live Law
AO Can't Draw An Adverse Inference For Mere Non-Response From Directors To Notices: Calcutta High Court
Live Law
I-T Authority Fails To Consider Reason For Difference In Sale Consideration & Stamp Duty: Mumbai ITAT Deletes Penalty Levied U/s 270A For Under-Reporting Of Income
Live Law
Income Tax Authority Should Refrain From Over Analysis Which Leads To Paralysis Of Justice: Bombay High Court
Live Law![[Income Tax Act] Supreme Court Decision In UOI v. Ashish Agarwal Applicable To Parties Who Challenged Notice U/S 148: Allahabad High Court](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2022/07/19/426550-allahabad-high-court-prayagraj-live-law.jpg)
[Income Tax Act] Supreme Court Decision In UOI v. Ashish Agarwal Applicable To Parties Who Challenged Notice U/S 148: Allahabad High Court
Live Law
AO Competent To Invoke Section 154 Jurisdiction If Glaring Mistake Of Fact/Law Is Committed While Passing Assessment Order: Madras High Court
Live Law
Once Reassessment Framed By AO Is Not Sustainable,Order U/s 263 Seeking To Revise Reassessment Is Not Acceptable: Delhi ITAT
Live Law
Direct Tax Cases Monthly Round Up: February 2024
Live Law
Change Of Opinion Does Not Constitute Justification To Believe Income Chargeable To Tax Has Escaped Assessment: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Taxpayer Staying In India For Less Than 182 Days As Per Exp 1(A) To Sec 6(1) Of I-T Act, Entitles To 'Non-Resident' Status: Mumbai ITAT
Live Law
Reopening Of Assessment Inspired From 'Review' & 'Change Of Opinion' By Subsequent AO Is Deprecated: Madras HC
Live Law
Dept.’s Personal Opinion Not Tangible Material For Reopening Assessment: Calcutta High Court Quashes Reassessment
Live Law
Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Assessments Against Agriculturist And Rickshaw Driver For Improper Sanction
Live Law
Re-Opening Is Not Permissible As It Falls Within The Purview Of A ‘Change Of Opinion’: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Director Proves Lack Of Control On Financial Affairs: Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Recovery
Live Law
Alternative Remedy Is Not Absolute Bar To Examine Conditions To Issue Reassessment Notice: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Live Law
Appearance Of AR Not Enough For Presuming Service On Assessee Under S. 292BB Of ITA: Orissa High Court
Live Law
Absence Of Material: Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Proceedings
Live Law
No Reason For AO To Believe Income Chargeable To Tax Escaped Assessment: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Reassessment Notice Based On Error Resulting From Oversight Of AO Is Not Valid: Delhi High Court
Live Law
In The Absence Of A Full And True Disclosure, Reassessment Is Not Barred By Limitation: Madras High Court
Live Law
Reassessment Notice Issued Against A Dead Person Would Be Invalid: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Recovery Of Tax Dues Of A Company From Its Directors Under Section 179 Of Income Tax Act, Cannot Be Invoked Casually: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Reopening of IT Assessment By Officer Having No Jurisdiction: Madras High Court Invalidates Proceedings
Live Law
Reassessment Proceedings Can't Be Initiated On Same Set Of Facts Available: ITAT
Live Law
Other Income Tax Additions In Reassessment Proceedings Cannot Be Sustained If Addition on Primary Grounds Is Not Made: ITAT
Live Law
Period Of Limitation Under S.153 Of Income Tax Act Applies To Remand Proceedings : Madras HC
Live Law
Delhi High Court Quashes Assessment Order For Not Giving Opportunity To File Objection To SCN
Live Law
Non-Service Of Notice On Assessee: ITAT Quashes Reassessment Order
Live Law
Assessee Should Be Given Opportunity To Produce Evidence Which Has Impact On Tax Liability : Calcutta High Court
Live Law
Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Order Issued Without Considering The Reply Filed By The Assessee
Live Law
Setting Aside Of Assessment Orders By ITAT On Technical Grounds Will Not Lead To Automatic Quashing Of Criminal Complaint: Madras High Court
Live Law
Monthly Digest Of Tax Cases: May 2022
Live LawDiscover Related































![[S.292B Income Tax Act] Inadvertent Mistakes In Reassessment Can Be Saved But Assessment Order Overlooking Apparent Error Cannot: Delhi HC](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2025/02/06/585371-chief-justice-devendra-kumar-upadhyaya-justice-tushar-rao-gedela-delhi-hc.jpg)












