Essar Insolvency: SC Hears Arguments Of Standard Chartered Bank & Operational Creditors Against CoC & Arcelor Mittal [Read Written Submissions]
Live LawPicking up from the last hearing, Sibal appearing on behalf of Standard Chartered Bank continued his arguments on the third day of the Essar Steel Insolvency hearing. Questioning the role of distribution taken over by the CoC, Sibal on SCB's behalf argued that the CoC is not authorised to decide the distribution of the resolution plan, and going by the provisions of section 30 of the IBC, the jurisdiction of the CoC is limited to consider the feasibility and viability of the resolution plan. However, it was argued by SCB that the Adjudicating Authority can examine the legality and validity of a resolution plan approved by the CoC on the touchstone of Section 30 read with Section 60 of the IBC, and can also therefore determine all questions regarding distribution of proceeds. Deliberating upon the question whether the NCLAT had overstepped its jurisdiction while taking decision on the distribution, Therefore, Sibal contended that questioning the correctness of the distribution proposed was within the scope and ambit of NCLAT's jurisdiction and the CoC's argument that it has abrogated to itself the right to re-write the resolution plan could not stand. Referring to the fact that Sibal had argued that SCB was only against the distribution of the resolution plan, and not the resolution plan itself, Salve said "If Sibal had made his impassioned plea against the 'obnoxious' behaviour of the CoC, then the whole resolution plan should be thrown out."