Bombay High Court Annual Digest 2022: Part I [Citations 1 – 257]
Live LawCitations: 2022 LiveLaw 1 to 2022 LiveLaw 257 Nominal Index XXX vs State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw 1 Kishnabhai Nathubhai Ghutia & Anr v. The Hon'ble Administrator Union Territory & Ors. vs State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw 257 Judgements/Orders Bombay High Court Orders Constitution of Medical Boards For Medical Termination Of Pregnancy As Mandated under the MTP Act Case Title: XXX vs State of Maharashtra Case No: Writ Petition NO.31015 OF 2021 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 1 The Bombay High Court directed the state Government to forthwith constitute medical boards based on the Amended Act on 'medical termination of pregnancy ', to easy the hardship caused to a women seeking termination of her pregnancy. Case Title: Alice Realities Pvt Ltd v State of Maharashtra Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 12 A Bench of Justices G.S.Patel and Madhav J.Jamdar of the Bombay High Court observed that the transfer of tenancy would not amount to the creation of a "new" tenancy under the MHADA Act and Development Control Regulations, 1991. Case Title: Somnath Laxman Giri vs State of Maharashtra Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 23 The Bombay High Court took strong exception to the seemingly deliberate non-functioning of CCTV cameras inside police stations and directed Maharashtra's Chief Secretary to take "stern action" against police officers for not reporting cameras that required repair. Case Title: Sankalp Resorts Limited & ors vs State of Maharashtra and ors Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 87 Once the Collector opines that a privately owned land parcel is not a "private forest," the Central Government's permission under the Forest Act, 1980 is unnecessary to exploit the land for development, the Bombay High Court held.