While Deciding Application Under S.319 CrPC, Court Must Consider Cross-examination As Well : Supreme Court
Live LawIn a recent case, the Supreme Court observed that the summoning of an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The Court said that due credence must be also given to the prosecution witness cross-examination, if exists, before the filing of the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The appellant pleaded that since both the examination in chief, as well as the cross-examination of the witnesses, were available on record when the application for summoning an additional accused was filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C., therefore it would be improper to decide the application without taking note of the witness's cross-examination. Applying the law to the facts of the present case, the Court found that the prosecution witnesses cross-examination statements altogether contradict their examination in chief, thereby making no room to justify the existence of a prima facie case requiring the trial court to exercise power under Section 319 Cr.P.C.