After Gaetz withdraws as attorney general choice, Trump names another Florida loyalist
LA TimesRep. Matt Gaetz arrives to speak before Sen. JD Vance at a campaign event on Nov. 4 in Atlanta. After Gaetz announced his withdrawal, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said the decision was “appropriate.” Sen. Charles E. Grassley said he respected Gaetz’s decision and looked forward to confirming “qualified” nominees moving forward. But clearly with Gaetz, Trump was given a clear — if “back channel” — message that the nomination was “not going to work.” “Even though the Republicans want to be loyal to Trump,” Shrum said, “you can push them too far.” Norman J. Ornstein, a left-leaning emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who has written extensively about the Senate’s dysfunction, said Senate Republicans scuttled Gaetz’s nomination because they anticipated more evidence of sexual misconduct by Gaetz coming out. Sen.-elect Adam B. Schiff of California said Gaetz was a “terrible choice for the nation’s top law enforcement agency,” a position that requires someone devoted to the rule of law, “not the person of the president or partisan agenda.” Some also suggested it should not prevent the release of the House ethics report about Gaetz — the same argument they made after Gaetz’s decision to resign from the House after Trump nominated him last week. Florida state Rep. Joel Rudman, a Republican who announced this week that he would run for Gaetz’s House seat, said Thursday on X that if Gaetz “wants to come back to Congress, I will support him 100%.” More broadly, Gaetz’s withdrawal marks an important moment in defining the limits of Trump’s power in a second term with a more pliant Congress and Supreme Court than during his first term — when his takeover of the Republican Party was still in its early stages.