Questions And Answers By Justice V. Ramkumar(4) -Investigation By Police-PART IV

INVESTIGATION BY THE POLICE – Part IV Q.16 In a corruption case the trap as well as the investigation was conducted by a DySP of Police in a station where a Superintendent of Police was available. SCC 208 = AIR 1992 SC 1389 – M. M. Punchhi, B. P. Jeevan Reddy – JJ; State of Punjab v. Mohri Ram 1994 Supp. v. Babul Nath 6 SCC 29 - Dr. A. S. Anand, Faizan Uddin - JJ; State of Gujarat v. Anirudhsing 6 SCC 514 = AIR 1997 SC 2780 – K. Ramaswamy, D. P. Wadhwa - JJ; Para 5 of Bijoy Singh v. State of Bihar 9 SCC 147 = AIR 2002 SC 1949 – R. P. Sethi, D. M. Dharmadhikari - JJ; Para 15 of Ravi Kumar v. State of Punjab 9 SCC 315 = AIR 2005 SC 1929 – Arijit Pasayat, S. H. Kapadia – JJ ; Para 18 of Ashram v. State of M.P. The chance recovery made in State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh 3 SCC 299 = AIR 1994 SC 1872 – S. Ratnavel Pandian, K. Jayachandra Reddy – JJ, was one such case. v. Krishna Master 12 SCC 324 = AIR 2010 SC 3071 – Harjit Singh Bedi, J. M. Panchal - JJ; Paras 20 and 21 of Budh Singh v. State of M.P 10 SCC 496 – S. B. Sinha, Markandey Katju - JJ; Paras 9 and 12 of Gunnana Pentayya v. State of A.P 16 SCC 59 – Dr. Arijit Pasayat, Dr. Mukundakam Sharma - JJ; State of Maharashtra v. Mohd.