S.195 CrPC Bar Not Applicable When Forgery Was Committed On Document Before It Was Given As Evidence In Court : Supreme Court
Dealing with a case involving allegations of forgery, the Supreme Court recently reiterated that there is no embargo under Section 195 of CrPC to examine an allegation of forgery of documents filed in Court, when such forgery is committed before its production.As per Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a Court can take cognizance of an offence of forgery in. Dealing with a case involving allegations of forgery, the Supreme Court recently reiterated that there is no embargo under Section 195 of CrPC to examine an allegation of forgery of documents filed in Court, when such forgery is committed before its production. As per Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a Court can take cognizance of an offence of forgery in relation to a document submitted in evidence in a Court proceeding only on a written complaint of an officer authorized by that Court As per the allegations, the respondents had fraudulently obtained stamp paper and prepared an unregistered sale agreement. The High Court quashed these proceedings, holding that there could be no FIR/private complaint for forgery of a document filed before Civil Court until the finality of the litigation.


Discover Related

Domestic Violence Act: All India Annual Digest 2024
![Madras High Court Monthly Digest - March 2025 [Citations 81-122]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Madras High Court Monthly Digest - March 2025 [Citations 81-122]

Court pulls up CBI for ‘fabricating evidence’ in justice Yadav case

Court adjourns hearing on NCP MLA Chhagan Bhujbal's release in corruption case

Don’t assign judicial work to new judge, lawyers tell Calcutta high court

Supreme Court dismisses challenge to Allahabad high court’s Sambhal mosque order

'Premature': SC refuses to entertain plea on cash discovery at HC judge Yashwant Varma's house

Plea for police probe into Delhi HC judge residence fire listed on March 28

Karnataka HC orders action against judge for citing 'fake' SC verdicts
