The primacy of liberty
Hindustan TimesIf the criminal justice system forms the skeletal frame of any democratic society and its functioning, then the fundamental right to liberty of every individual must be considered its spine because it is this logic that recognises the full personhood of an individual and limits the powers of the otherwise formidable State. A bench of justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta held that even in the case involving the tough anti-narcotics law, the liberty of an individual would take precedence over the statutory embargo in a particular statute, and that the period of incarceration of an accused shall remain a relevant factor. That this strong pronouncement came in a case involving a law that reverses the usual presumption of innocence, ascribes culpability to the accused for the alleged offence and puts the onus on her to rebut the legal presumption is significant – especially at a time when stringent laws are often weaponised to keep accused behind bars, even if there is not sufficient proof to secure a conviction. The top court’s recent statement highlights its unwavering stance on individual liberties and granting of bail, but for firm progress, there needs to be a shift in attitudes, both within prosecuting agencies and the lower judiciary in accepting the primacy of individual liberty.