The Weinstein ruling is an insult to rape victims, whatever his lawyers say
The IndependentHarvey Weinstein was one of the principal monsters of the MeToo movement. Fast forward to 2024, and Weinstein’s 2020 rape conviction was overturned by an appeals court because of a “crucial” error in the initial trial. Cosby’s lawyer said, it’s “a beautiful day for women… and justice for black America.” Weinstein’s lawyer echoed this sentiment yesterday, saying it’s a “great day for America” after announcing his client’s rape conviction had been overturned. In a scathing dissent, Judge Singas accused the majority judges of “fundamental misunderstandings of sexual violence perpetrated by men known to, and with significant power over, the women they victimise … By whitewashing the facts to conform to a he-said/she-said narrative, by ignoring evidence of defendant’s manipulation and premeditation … this Court has continued a disturbing trend of overturning juries’ guilty verdicts in cases involving sexual violence.” Singas explained that “the defence sought to capitalize on these pervasive rape myths, and rape culture at large, asking the jury to believe that, despite their words and actions, the victims were consenting”. Ashley Judd, one of the first to step forward against Weinstein, responded to the news by saying, “This is what it’s like to be a woman in America, living with male entitlement to our bodies.” Until systemic reforms are enacted to dismantle power imbalances, and survivor-centric approaches are prioritised, the justice system will continue to fail in its most fundamental duty: to protect and uphold justice.