To protect personal liberty, enforce standardised parameters on bail
Hindustan TimesThe death of 84-year-old Father Stan Swamy in custody has rekindled the debate on the scope of pre-trial detention. The courts have often stressed that personal liberty is humankind’s most valuable possession, and the law of bail has to find the balance between two conflicting demands — shielding society from criminals, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. In the 1978 case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu, Justice VR Krishna Iyer recognised the grey area of pre-trial bail and noticed that it “largely hinges on the hunch of the bench, otherwise called judicial discretion”. Recognising that personal liberty is too precious a value in India’s constitutional system, he stated, “To glamorize impressionistic orders as discretionary may, on occasions, make a litigative gamble decisive of a fundamental right.” Deprivation of the liberty of an individual is a serious matter. Sensitising magistrates on the importance of zealous scrutiny of remand applications and monitoring by superior courts will go a long way towards achieving the constitutional goal of protecting personal liberty.