Mozilla + Google: Browser Wars Are Really Search Wars by Proxy
For a moment, it looked like it might all fall apart. Failing to come to an agreement would cost Google money -- quite possibly a lot of money, as Mozilla's Firefox still edges out Google's Chrome in most measurements of browser usage -- but probably wouldn't have changed the overall trajectory of the company much. Firefox's most likely backup plan -- extending Most Favored Search Engine status to Bing instead of Google -- would have been unthinkable just five years ago, with Mozilla positioning itself as the anti-Microsoft and Firefox as the anti-Internet Explorer. Firefox product head Asa Dotzler also played down concerns over Mozilla's future with Google as hype: I know some of you all have been reading crazy press articles about how Google's going to quit paying Mozilla for Firefox search traffic and I understand that's been unsettling to folks. But in December 2009, after Google's Eric Schmidt famously dismissed privacy concerns by saying, "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place," Mozilla's Dotzler was a lot less happy with the foundation's key partner:
Discover Related

Why is Google accused of being an illegal monopoly? | Explained

Google Loses Massive Antitrust Case Over Search Dominance

Google illegally maintains monopoly over internet search, judge rules

Google loses major antitrust case over search, declared a monopoly by judge

Would You Still Use Google if It Didn't Pay Apple $20 Billion to Get on Your iPhone?

Can Microsoft succeed in clawing back the search leadership from Google?

Google pays ‘enormous’ sums to maintain search-engine dominance: US Justice dept

Google antitrust lawsuit: Why dethroning Google Search is so hard

The Google Chrome Vs Microsoft Edge Battle Is Proving To Be Bad News For Mozilla Firefox

Yahoo replaces Google as default US Firefox search engine
