![Making Contradictory Statements At Trial Isn’t An Offence By Itself: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Making Contradictory Statements At Trial Isn’t An Offence By Itself: SC [Read Judgment]
Live LawIt must be shown that false statement was intentionally given for the purpose of using the same at any stage of the judicial proceedings, the court observed.The Supreme Court in Amarsang Nathaji vs. Hardik Harshadbhai Patel, has said the mere fact that a person made a contradictory statement in a judicial proceeding was not by itself always sufficient to justify prosecution under Sections 199. The apex court said: There are two pre-conditions for initiating proceedings under Section 340 CrPC: materials produced before the court must make out a prima facie case for a complaint for the purpose of inquiry into an offence referred to in clause of sub-Section of Section 195 of the CrPC, and it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into the alleged offence. The mere fact that a person has made a contradictory statement in a judicial proceeding is not by itself always sufficient to justify a prosecution under Sections 199 and 200 of the Indian Penal Code ; but it must be shown that the defendant has intentionally given a false statement at any stage of the judicial proceedings or fabricated false evidence for the purpose of using the same at any stage of the judicial proceedings. The court has to form an opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice to initiate an inquiry into the offences of false evidence and offences against public justice and more specifically referred in Section 340 of the CrPC, having regard to the overall factual matrix as well as the probable consequences of such a prosecution Such an opinion can be formed even without conducting a preliminary inquiry, if the formation of opinion is otherwise possible On forming such an opinion in respect of such an offence which appears to have been committed, the court has to take a further decision as to whether any complaint should be made or not Only if the decision is in the affirmative, the court needs to make a complaint in writing and the complaint thus made in writing is then to be sent to a Magistrate of competent jurisdiction Under Section 343 of the CrPC, the Magistrate has to deal with the complaint referred to in Section 340 of the CrPC as if it was instituted on a police report.
History of this topic

Portion Of S.161 CrPC Statement Used To Contradict Witness Must Be Proved Through Investigating Officer & Marked: Supreme Court
Live Law
Magistrate Has Discretion To Record Statement U/S 313 CrPC If Accused Has Not Examined Or Cross-Examined Witnesses: Karnataka High Court
Live Law
S.482 CrPC | Criminal Proceedings Can Be Quashed Based On Witness Statements Only In Rare Circumstances To Avoid Injustice: Karnataka HC
Live Law
Can't Be Given Chance to Discredit Prosecution Documents: Supreme Court Rules in 294 CrPC Case
Live Law
Magistrate Using Expression "To Ascertain Truth Or Falsehood Of Complaint" Indicates Intent To Proceed Under Chapter XVI Of CrPC: J&K High Court
Live Law
Conviction Cannot Be Solely Based On Admissions Made By Accused In His Statement Under Section 313 CrPC: Bombay High Court
Live Law![Statement U/s 161 CrPC Inadmissible In Evidence And Cannot Be Relied Upon For Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Statement U/s 161 CrPC Inadmissible In Evidence And Cannot Be Relied Upon For Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![(Rape) Conviction Cannot Be Solely Based On Statements Made To Police U/s 154/161 CrPC: SC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
(Rape) Conviction Cannot Be Solely Based On Statements Made To Police U/s 154/161 CrPC: SC [Read Order]
Live Law![313 CrPC-False Explanation By Accused Can't Be Used To Complete The Chain Of Circumstances To Establish His Guilt: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
313 CrPC-False Explanation By Accused Can't Be Used To Complete The Chain Of Circumstances To Establish His Guilt: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Conviction Cannot Be Based Solely On Co-Accused’s ‘Confessional Statement’: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Conviction Cannot Be Based Solely On Co-Accused’s ‘Confessional Statement’: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Making Contradictory Statements At Trial Isn’t An Offence By Itself: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Making Contradictory Statements At Trial Isn’t An Offence By Itself: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Prosecution Needs To Establish Case Beyond All ‘Reasonable’ Doubts, Not All Doubts: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Prosecution Needs To Establish Case Beyond All ‘Reasonable’ Doubts, Not All Doubts: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Prosecution Needs To Establish Case Beyond All ‘Reasonable’ Doubts, Not All Doubts: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Prosecution Needs To Establish Case Beyond All ‘Reasonable’ Doubts, Not All Doubts: SC [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related





























![[Prevention Of Corruption Act] CBI Can File Final Report Even If No Offence Is Revealed During Probe: Kerala High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)







![[SC/ST Act] Victim Belonging SC/ST Community Not Sufficient To Attract Offence Without Intention To Humiliate Due To Caste Identity: P&H High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)




![[NDPS Act] Not For Accused To Prove Seized Samples Were Not In Safe Custody, Burden Lies On Prosecution To Establish Safe Handling: J&K High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)


