'Terrorist Acts' Under UAPA Only Deal With Matters Impacting 'Defence Of India' And Not Ordinary Law & Order Problems : Delhi High Court
Live LawDelivering a judgment defining the contours of the otherwise "vague" Section 15 of the Unlawful Activities Act, 1967, a division bench of the Delhi High Court today laid down some important principles upon the imposition of Section 15, 17 & 18 of the Act. "Terrorist Act" U/S 15 UAPA Should Not Be Used Lightly So As To Trivialize Them Noting that the words 'terrorist act', including conspiracy and act preparatory to the commission of a terrorist act, were brought within the purview of the UAPA by the Amendment of 2004, on the heels of the Parliament repealing POTA in the year 2004 and TADA having already been repealed in 1995, the court said, "the phrase 'terrorist act' must get its colour and flavour from the problem of terrorism as was earlier addressed by the Parliament under TADA and POTA. "Terrorist Activity" Is That Which Travels Beyond The Capacity Of Law Enforcement Agencies To Deal With Under Ordinary Penal Law The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Hitendra Vishnu Thakur, to hold that, "the extent and reach of terrorist activity must travel beyond the effect of an ordinary crime and must not arise merely by causing disturbance of law and order or even public order; and must be such that it travels beyond the capacity of the ordinary law enforcement agencies to deal with it under the ordinary penal law." "Terrorist Act" Can't Be Casually Applied To Cases Falling Within Conventional Offences Under IPC The court held in this regard that, "notwithstanding the fact that the definition of 'terrorist act' in S.15 UAPA is wide and even somewhat vague, the phrase must partake of the essential character of terrorism and the phrase 'terrorist act' cannot be permitted to be casually applied to criminal acts or omissions that fall squarely within the definition of conventional offences as defined inter alia under the IPC." "Terrorist Activity" Under Amended UAPA Implies Matters Of Profound Impact On "Defence Of India" – Nothing More, Nothing Less Defining the contours of "terrorist act" under S. 15 UAPA, the court said, "In our opinion, the intent and purport of the Parliament in enacting the UAPA, and more specifically in amending it in 2004 and 2008 to bring terrorist activity within its scope, was, and could only have had been, to deal with matters of profound impact on the 'Defence of India', nothing more and nothing less."