Trump trial: Michael Cohen's cross-examination brings biggest weakness of Trump's defense into view.
SlateRead our ongoing coverage of Donald Trump’s first criminal trial here. Bragg’s prosecution team immediately objected, and Justice Juan Merchan sustained the objection, but not before Cohen could demurely respond, “Sounds like something I would do.” Blanche kept on this track, though, asking Cohen if he had also insulted Trump attorney Susan Necheles. The strongest moment in questioning came when Blanche confronted Cohen with the notes from an August 2018 meeting with special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe team, during which Cohen seemingly lied by telling investigators that he “might” have spoken with Trump after the release of the Access Hollywood tape in October 2016. Blanche went at great length to list times when Cohen had—while he was still “on Trump’s team” to use Cohen’s language—praised the former president lavishly. This distinction between how Cohen “felt” about Donald Trump at various times in his life and the “truth” about Trump the human seemed ludicrous, but the purpose This was the same approach the defense team took with Stormy Daniels, in fact, spending hours on seeming minutiae, such as whether Daniels actually ate dinner with Trump the night of their alleged sexual encounter and her views on the paranormal.