![Sanction is mandatory prerequisite even when an additional Accused is added under Section 319CrPC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Sanction is mandatory prerequisite even when an additional Accused is added under Section 319CrPC [Read Judgment]
Live LawThe Supreme Court in SURINDERJIT SINGH MAND VS. STATE OF PUNJAB has held that protection of ‘sanction’under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code is not available to police officers accused of illegal detention and offences committed during the period before the formal-arrest is recorded.Reiterating the settled law that Courts cannot take cognizance of the complaints against the. The Supreme Court in SURINDERJIT SINGH MAND VS. STATE OF PUNJAB has held that protection of ‘sanction’under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code is not available to police officers accused of illegal detention and offences committed during the period before the formal-arrest is recorded. OFFENCES COMMITTED DURING ILLEGAL DETENTION DOES NOT REQUIRE ‘SANCTION’ The contention raised by the appellants was that even if it was assumed that Neeraj Kumar had been detained with effect from 24.06.1999, his detention by the appellants was “while acting or purporting to act” in the discharge of the appellants’ official duties and as such, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, could not have taken cognizance, without sanction under Section 197 of the ‘Code’. We therefore hereby, endorse the conclusions drawn by the High Court, to the above effect.” SANCTION IS MANDATORY PRE REQUISITE EVEN IF COGNIZANCE IS TAKEN UNDER SECTION 319 CRPC Addressing the other contention of the respondents that that where cognizance is taken under Section 319 of the ‘Code’, sanction either under Section 197 of the ‘Code’ is not a mandatory pre-requisite, the court further observed : The law declared by this Court emerging from the judgments referred to hereinabove, leaves no room for any doubt, that under Section 197 of the ‘Code’ and/or sanction mandated under a special statute would be a necessary pre-requisite, before a Court of competent jurisdiction, takes cognizance of an offence.
History of this topic
![[Maharashtra Protection Of Depositors Act] Seriousness Of Accusation No Reason To Deny Bail To Undertrial If Half Sentence Served: High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Maharashtra Protection Of Depositors Act] Seriousness Of Accusation No Reason To Deny Bail To Undertrial If Half Sentence Served: High Court
Live Law
Got sanction to prosecute NCP's Anil Deshmukh in corruption case: CBI tells court
India Today
"Record Satisfaction Before Authorizing Detention In Exercise Of Powers U/S 167 CrPC": AP High Court Directs Judicial Magistrates
Live Law
Tipu Jayanti Tweets : Karnataka High Court Directs Magistrate To Decide Afresh Complaints Against Anant Kumar Hegde, CT Ravi
Live Law![Failure To Comply With Prescribed Time Limit By Sanctioning Authority Vitiates Sanction : Kerala HC Quashes UAPA And Sedition Charges [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Failure To Comply With Prescribed Time Limit By Sanctioning Authority Vitiates Sanction : Kerala HC Quashes UAPA And Sedition Charges [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Request for sanction to prosecute Kanhaiya, others pending before Delhi govt: Police tells court
India TV News![Previous Sanction For Investigating Public Servants: HC Rectifies, But SC Reiterates ‘Erroneous’ View [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Previous Sanction For Investigating Public Servants: HC Rectifies, But SC Reiterates ‘Erroneous’ View [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Previous Sanction For Investigating Public Servants: HC Rectifies, But SC Reiterates ‘Erroneous’ View [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Previous Sanction For Investigating Public Servants: HC Rectifies, But SC Reiterates ‘Erroneous’ View [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Sanction to prosecute Public Servant, not required at pre cognizance stage ; Supreme Court Jt in Anil Kumar v. Aiyappa is per incuriam : Kerala HC
Live Law
Sanction for Prosecution ; In my view, George Vs. State of Kerala – 2015(3) KLT 219 does not lay down the correct law
Live Law
Sanction for Prosecution ; In my view, George Vs. State of Kerala – 2015(3) KLT 219 does not lay down the correct law
Live Law
Trial of Public Servant with Invalid Sanction is Null and void and Non-est; Second Trial is permissible with Valid Sanction: SC
Live Law
High Court drops certain charges against Lalu, upholds CBI plea to continue proceedings
India TV News![Breaking ; No Automatic Arrest in 498-A Cases, SC Issues Strict guidelines to Police and Magistrates, Non Compliance will Attract Disciplinary & Contempt Proceedings [Read the Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Breaking ; No Automatic Arrest in 498-A Cases, SC Issues Strict guidelines to Police and Magistrates, Non Compliance will Attract Disciplinary & Contempt Proceedings [Read the Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related















































