Ballots can’t be tossed out over voter signature, court says
Associated PressHARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court ruled unanimously Friday on a key concern surrounding an avalanche of mailed ballots, prohibiting counties from rejecting them if the voter’s signature on it does not resemble the signature on the voter’s registration form. Republican lawmakers and the Trump campaign had argued that the law is clear that election officials must compare the information on the mail-in ballot envelope, including a voter’s signature, to a voter’s information on file to determine a person’s qualifications to vote. Both said that the law on mail-in ballots makes it clear only that the ballot envelope requires the voter’s signature, but not a matching signature. “We are protecting every eligible vote and ensuring each is counted.” Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre, accused Boockvar of undermining election security provisions in state law and said lawmakers never thought it could be interpreted to render “signatures required on the mail-in ballots being meaningless.” “People voting in person are now being held to a higher standard than those who mail in their ballots,” he said in a statement. He also said it is “astonishing” that courts endorsed the interpretation that matching signatures are required to vote in person, “but mail-in voting is officially a free-for-all.” The decision comes amid a surge in mail-in voting and rising concerns that tens of thousands of mailed ballots will be discarded in the presidential election over a variety of technicalities.