
Commission Expenses Can Be Allowed If Taxpayer Satisfies Rendering Of Services By Commission Agents And Income From Same Is Shown In Return: Mumbai ITAT
Live LawWhile deleting the addition made u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, the Mumbai ITAT directed the assessee to file the details of the services rendered by the commission agents for availing the commission payment from the assessee. The ITAT clarified that if the assessee satisfies the AO about the services rendered by these commission agents and that they had shown their income as the commission paid by the assessee, then such commission expenses are to be allowed under law. The Bench of the ITAT comprising Aby T. Varkey and S Rifaur Rahman observed that “given an opportunity the assessee would be able to prove before AO that these commission agents had filed their respective ITR's and demonstrate that commission paid to these agents have been duly shown by them as income in their hands i.e, thirteen commission agents. However, the AO was of the view that the assessee couldn't prove what services these thirteen parties rendered to the assessee for earning the commission of Rs.44,36,581/- and therefore he disallowed the commission expenditure as well as the franking charges booked by the assessee to the tune of Rs.4,25,176/-. The CIT upheld the AO's action since the assessee could not file proof in support of the services rendered by thirteen commission agents and the incurrence of franking charges.
History of this topic

I-T Authority Fails To Consider Reason For Difference In Sale Consideration & Stamp Duty: Mumbai ITAT Deletes Penalty Levied U/s 270A For Under-Reporting Of Income
Live Law
Ascertained Liability Can't Be Added Back As Per Clause (C) Of Explanation-1 To Sec 115JB(2): Mumbai ITAT
Live Law
Taxpayer Must Substantiate Form 26AS Or Form 16 So As To Claim Credit Over TDS: Mumbai ITAT
Live Law
No Question Of Invoking Sec 201(1)/201(1A) if Taxpayer Has Deducted TDS At Appropriate Rates: Rajkot ITAT
Live Law
CIT(A) Has No Jurisdiction To Enhance Income U/S 251(1) By Disallowing ESOP Expenses In Revised Return If AO Has Not Dealt With It: Mumbai ITAT
Live Law
ITAT Dirests ALP Computation Towards Guarantee Commission @ 0.3523% In Case Of Macrotech Developers
Live Law
No Basis Of Allocation Or Actual Cost Incurred For Affiliates: ITAT Confirms Additions For Cost Reimbursement As FTS
Live Law
AO Can’t Make Addition On The Basis Of Statement Without Corroborating It With Any Other Material: ITAT
Live Law
Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 07 May to 13 May, 2023
Live Law
Sec.194H Income Tax Act Attracted For 'Supplementary Commission' Earned By Travel Agents ; Airlines Liable To Deduct TDS : Supreme Court
Live Law
Expenses Towards Advertisement, Brokerage And Commission, Incurred By A Real Estate Developer; Deductible As Revenue Expenditure: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Any sum paid to an employee as a bonus or commission to be allowed as a deduction: ITAT Delhi
Live Law
TDS Provisions Not Applicable To Commission Paid To Bank: ITAT
Live Law
Other Income Tax Additions In Reassessment Proceedings Cannot Be Sustained If Addition on Primary Grounds Is Not Made: ITAT
Live Law
Non Production Of Persons Despite Summons Leads To Inference Of Routing Own Money : ITAT Delhi
Live LawDiscover Related















































