Individual Performing 'Public Duty' Will Come Under Prevention Of Corruption Act Though Not A 'Public Servant' : Karnataka High Court
Live LawThe Karnataka High Court has held that even if an individual is not a public servant, but if he is discharging "public duty" by virtue of his office, he is answerable to the State and public and he comes within the ambit of the Prevention of Corruption Act. G.Krishnegowda, working as a project manager at Nirmithi Kendra, Chikkaballapura, had approached the court seeking to quash the FIR registered against him by the Anti Corruption Bureau,, Chickkaballapura, for the offences punishable under Sections 13 read with 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Justice S Vishwajith Shetty while dismissing the petition last month said, "It is now well settled that even if an individual is not a public servant, but if he is discharging "public duty" by virtue of his office, he is answerable to the State and public and he comes within the ambit of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Reliance was placed on the judgment of the high court in the case of Gopinath Alias Gopinathsa Vs The Superintendent Of Police, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bijapur & Another - 2014 Kccr 3668, has held that the employee of the Nirmithi Kendra cannot be termed as a public servant, and therefore, had quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner therein under the P.C.Act by the Karnataka Lokayukta Police. Relying on the judgment of the apex court in Manusukhbhai Kanjibhai Shah's case, the court said, "Having regard to the fact that the Nirmithi Kendra in which the petitioner is employed has been receiving funds from the State and the Central Government and taking into consideration the definition of the word 'public servant' as found in the P.C.Act, it cannot be but said that the petitioner is a public servant.