Trial Court Erred In Closing Evidence Upon Refusal Of Accused's Counsel To Enter Appearance: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside POCSO Conviction
Live LawRajasthan High Court has set aside the conviction of a man convicted by the Special POCSO Court on the grounds that when the appellant's counsel refused to appear, instead of appointing an Amicus Curiae at that instance, the trial court closed the evidence. It was contended by the Amicus Curiae on behalf of the appellant that on account of trial court's failure to appoint an Amicus Curiae when the appellant's counsel failed to appear on his behalf, cross-examination of two main witnesses could not happen in the case. The Court agreed with the submission put forth by the Amicus Curiae and highlighted that when the appellants' counsel refused to appear, the trial court closed the evidence and thereafter approached the District Legal Services Authority, for appointment of an Amicus Curiae. The matter was remanded back to the trial court to be decided afresh and directions were given for appointment of an Amicus Curiae for the appellant, re-summoning of the two witnesses and permitting their cross-examination.