Kidnapping For Ransom - Necessary To Prove Threat To Cause Death Or Harm For Conviction Under Section 364A IPC : Supreme Court
Live LawThe Supreme Court has held that merely proving the kidnap of a person is not sufficient for conviction for the offfence of 'kidnapping for ransom' under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code. Ingredients of Section 364A IPC The Court held that the essential ingredients to be proved by the prosecution for proving the offence under Section 364A IPC are as follows : Kidnapping or abduction of any person or keeping a person in detention after such kidnapping or abduction; and threatens to cause death or hurt to such person, or by his conduct gives rise to a reasonable apprehension that such person maybe put to death or hurt or; causes hurt or death to such person in order to compel the Government or any foreign State or any Governmental organization or any other person to do or abstain from doing any act or to pay a ransom. "Thus, for covering an offence under Section 364A,apart from fulfillment of first condition, the second condition, i.e., "and threatens to cause death or hurt to such person" also needs to be proved in case the case is not covered by subsequent clauses joined by "or"." In such circumstances, the Supreme Court concluded that second condition of Section 364A IPC was not proved in the case.