CrPC | Order Of Maintenance Does Not Get Wiped Out Because Of Settlement During Pendency Of Execution Proceedings: J&K&L High Court
Live LawThe Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court recently held that merely because a settlement has taken place between warring spouses during the pendency of execution proceedings, the order of maintenance passed by a Magistrate under Section 488 of J&K CrPC does not get wiped out if the settlement does not work. A bench comprising Justice Sanjay Dhar was hearing a plea in terms of which the petitioner had challenged an order passed by Judicial Magistrate in an execution petition filed by the respondents against the petitioner seeking execution of order of maintenance passed by a Magistrate Court in 2015. Court also took note of the fact that the settlement could not work, as a result of which respondents again approached the learned trial Magistrate by way of an execution petition and accordingly the impugned order came to be passed by the trial Magistrate in the said execution petition in which a direction was issued to the DDO to deduct an amount of Rs.18,000/ on account of monthly maintenance from the salary of the petitioner. Adjudicating upon the matter Justice Dhar observed that it would be apt to make it clear that merely because a settlement has taken place between warring spouses or between the father and the minor children during the pendency of execution proceedings, the order of maintenance passed by a Magistrate under Section 488 of J&K CrPC does not get wiped out if the settlement does not work.