'Many Eminent Lawyers Are Not Willing To Join The Bench But Are Ready To Work As Ad-Hoc Judges': Supreme Court
Live LawThe Supreme Court, on Thursday, asked Senior Advocate, Mr. Arvind P. Datar and the Attorney General for India, Mr. R. Venkataramani to brainstorm and come up with a less cumbersome process to appoint ad-hoc judges in the High Court. While hearing two applications filed in the PIL preferred by NGO Lok Prahari seeking invocation of Article 224A for appointment of ad-hoc judges to tackle the problem of mounting case arrears in High Courts, the Bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, A.S. Oka and Vikram Nath noted that though senior lawyers are often not willing to take up permanent positions at the Bench, they might be inclined to take up ad-hoc positions for a couple of years as a part of their social commitment. Even if there are not many old cases pending, but depending on the jurisdiction, a situation of mounting arrears is likely to arise if the rate of disposal is consistently lower than the rate of filing over a period of a year or more On Thursday, at the outset, Justice Kaul remarked that the procedure for appointment of ad-hoc judges seems to be very "cumbersome" and may "not work". He added that these eminent lawyers after completing their term of appointment shall abstain from practicing in High Courts where they serve as ad-hoc judges. "Many eminent lawyers are not willing to join the Bench but ready to work as ad-hoc judges in some courts and will not practice in that court again."