'Many Eminent Lawyers Are Not Willing To Join The Bench But Are Ready To Work As Ad-Hoc Judges': Supreme Court
2 years ago

'Many Eminent Lawyers Are Not Willing To Join The Bench But Are Ready To Work As Ad-Hoc Judges': Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court, on Thursday, asked Senior Advocate, Mr. Arvind P. Datar and the Attorney General for India, Mr. R. Venkataramani to brainstorm and come up with a less cumbersome process to appoint ad-hoc judges in the High Court. While hearing two applications filed in the PIL preferred by NGO Lok Prahari seeking invocation of Article 224A for appointment of ad-hoc judges to tackle the problem of mounting case arrears in High Courts, the Bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, A.S. Oka and Vikram Nath noted that though senior lawyers are often not willing to take up permanent positions at the Bench, they might be inclined to take up ad-hoc positions for a couple of years as a part of their social commitment. Even if there are not many old cases pending, but depending on the jurisdiction, a situation of mounting arrears is likely to arise if the rate of disposal is consistently lower than the rate of filing over a period of a year or more On Thursday, at the outset, Justice Kaul remarked that the procedure for appointment of ad-hoc judges seems to be very "cumbersome" and may "not work". He added that these eminent lawyers after completing their term of appointment shall abstain from practicing in High Courts where they serve as ad-hoc judges. "Many eminent lawyers are not willing to join the Bench but ready to work as ad-hoc judges in some courts and will not practice in that court again."

History of this topic

Supreme Court vs Government: Not advisable to “hold up” judicial process
1 year, 2 months ago
Ad-hocism in appointing judges of higher courts must stop
1 year, 10 months ago
Many successful lawyers reluctant to join bench due tedious appointment process: SC
2 years ago
Process to appoint ad hoc judges must be less cumbersome: Supreme Court
2 years ago
Article 224A : Supreme Court To Consider Centre's Status Report On Appointing Ad-Hoc HC Judges Tomorrow
2 years ago
DC Edit | Transparency needed in appointment of judges
2 years ago
'I Have A List Of Lawyers In My Mind' : CJI Chandrachud On SCBA Demand To Consider Supreme Court Lawyers For Elevation As High Court Judges
2 years, 1 month ago
DC Edit | Judges’ pick: Make it transparent
2 years, 1 month ago
Supreme Court Seeks Status Report From Union On Appointment Of Ad-Hoc Judges In High Courts
2 years, 3 months ago
Ad Hoc Appointments Can Be Made On Rotational Basis, Seniority Not A Criteria: Karnataka High Court
2 years, 5 months ago
Five High Courts Have 54% Share in Total Pending Cases of Over 57.51 Lakhs in 25 HCs: SC
3 years, 8 months ago
'Article 224A Of Constitution A Salutary Provision' : Supreme Court Reserves Orders On Plea For Ad-Hoc Judges In High Court
3 years, 8 months ago
Supreme Court Mulls Guidelines For Appointment Of Ad-Hoc Judges Under Article 224A; Seeks Views Of High Courts
3 years, 8 months ago
No Bar In Considering Supreme Court Lawyers For High Court Judgeship, Says Supreme Court
3 years, 8 months ago
About 3.5 Crore Cases Pending In Indian District Courts: Plea In Supreme Court For Appointment Of More Judges In Subordinate Judiciary
3 years, 11 months ago
Appointment To The Supreme Court: Identifying Trends And Patterns
4 years, 2 months ago

Discover Related