There Should Be Finality To Assessment, Can’t Have Repeated Reassessment Proceeding On The Dictate Of Audit Party: Jharkhand High Court
Live LawThe Jharkhand High Court has held that if the assessing authority is allowed to initiate repeated re-assessment proceedings against an assessee merely on the dictate of the audit party, there would not be finality of assessment. The bench of Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay and Justice Deepak Roshan has observed that, as far as Sections 42 and 42 of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act are concerned, the Legislature has deliberately inserted the non-obstante clause extending period of limitation, but the Legislature has not extended the period of limitation pursuant to an audit objection under Section 42. The only enabling provision for carrying out reassessment proceedings is contained under Section 40, read with Section 40 of the JVAT Act, which prescribes a period of limitation of five years. The issue raised was whether Section 42 is an independent provision conferring power of re-assessment or is merely an additional ground conferred upon the assessing authority for carrying out reassessment proceedings.