How Lutyens’ Delhi Derailed Nitish Kumar’s Political Career — And Bihar’s Growth Prospect
News 18In 1991, American economist Robert Reich wrote an article highlighting the growing social divide in the US. In fact, as author-journalist Sanjaya Baru writes in India’s Power Elite: Class, Caste and a Cultural Revolution, “o one represented this elite better than the country’s first political family, the Nehru–Gandhis, and the many families cutting across professions that benefited from serving the family’s successive generations.” Baru continues, “From Motilal to Jawaharlal, on to Indira and Rajiv, and then Rajiv’s widow Sonia and her children, the Nehru-Gandhi family symbolised this continuity in pre-Independence and post-Independence power elite. Baru writes, “Vajpayee … was himself a long-standing member of the Lutyens’ elite and indeed belonged to what Modi and his groupies would dub the ‘Khan Market Gang’, so to speak. Baru writes, “When Vajpayee was defeated and Manmohan Singh took over, there was a shake-up in the bureaucracy and many Vajpayee loyalists were moved out of important positions, but the Lutyens’ elite very quickly adjusted itself to the new dispensation, with ‘our friend Nandu’ replaced by a ‘our friend Montek’.” But the NK story doesn’t end there. In fact, Simon Denyer, former Indian bureau of chief for the Washington Post, told this writer way back in 2014, at the launch of his book, Rogue Elephant: Harnessing the Power of India’s Unruly Democracy, how Manmohan Singh was deeply upset over the publication of an article, “India’s ‘silent’ prime minister becomes a tragic figure”, in the Washington Post on 4 September 2012.