The need for an Indian system to regulate AI

Consider these facts: Artificial Intelligence is here to stay; AI possesses the capability to fundamentally change the way in which we work; AI can, by assimilation of data from multifarious online sources, present far more powerful solutions than any human can; AI is a far greater force of either good or evil. As far as the eastern models are concerned, the Japanese government’s Integrated Innovation Strategy Promotion Council has framed a set of rules called the “Social Principles of Human-Human-Centric AI”. The underlying theories After examining the cultural relativism between the eastern and the western systems, Professor Northrop concluded that eurocentric legal systems created rules of law through “postulation”. On the other hand, eastern or oriental legal systems created rules of law through “intuition”. It has gone on to state: “The responsible AI principles discussed earlier in this Paper, have been developed by first identifying systemic considerations prevalent among AI systems across the world, and identifying principles that may be used to mitigate the identified considerations.” A reading of the discussion paper suggests that NITI Aayog is going to follow the western model.