
Gilchrist: Third-umpire should be able to spot no-balls
The HinduAustralian great Adam Gilchrist feels the third umpire should be able to spot no-balls although he is all for the fourth umpire to take the call in the IPL, provided correct decisions are made. Gilchrist made the comments after the IPL governing council proposed to have a dedicated “no-ball” umpire to reduce the number of howlers in the lucrative league. “That should be allowed, whether you need a fourth umpire, maybe not why can’t the third umpire just look at the replay and just go 'not out',” he said. India skipper Virat Kohli even had a heated exchange with Indian umpire S Ravi, who failed to spot a no-ball by Mumbai Indians’ Sri Lankan pacer Lasith Malinga, which proved costly for the Royal Challengers Bangalore during one of the IPL matches.
History of this topic

MI dugout caught sending signals for DRS, demand for specialist 3rd umpire grows after 'too many questionable decisions'
Hindustan Times
Explained: The no-ball controversy that rocked DC vs RR clash and why umpires didn't refer the decision upstairs
Firstpost
IPL 2020: All-Stars game confirmed ahead of season opener
The Hindu
India vs West Indies: Third umpire to call front foot no balls in limited-overs series, says ICC
Firstpost
India vs West Indies: TV umpires to call front-foot no-balls in ICC trial
The Hindu
Ganguly: IPL 2020 to have designated umpire to spot no-balls
The Hindu
BCCI using India matches to test ‘camera spotting’ of no-balls
Hindustan Times
TV umpire no-ball trials from India-West Indies series
Hindustan Times
AUS vs PAK, 1st Test: Australian Legends Slam 3rd Umpire For Rizwan's Controversial Dismissal
ABP News
Adam Gilchrist says third umpires should spot no-balls, but backs IPL Governing Council's decision to bring in extra official to avoid howlers
Firstpost
TV umpire to call no-balls in England-Pakistan ODIs
Firstpost
Out Or Not Out, Third Umpire Creates Confusion
India TV NewsDiscover Related















































