Harvard's top-level exit: Politics has trumped academic principle
Live MintIn a world of viral video clips and memes, academics who find themselves exposed to political scrutiny often seem ill-equipped for it. At a Congressional hearing last month on alleged anti-Jewish expressions on campus, a Republican Senator had posed Gay a yes-or-no question: “At Harvard, does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Harvard’s rules of bullying and harassment—yes or no?" These were resisted by Harvard’s board, which stood by its first African-American president as she was “subjected to personal attacks and threats fueled by racial animus," as her exit note this week put it. Since there have been no reports of any call for genocide on Harvard’s campus—although arguments against Israel can falsely be interpreted as such if a nation-state is conflated with a religious group, a fallacy many fall for—we should take at face value Gay’s statement of intent once she found that campus bonds were fraying: “I have sought to confront hate while preserving free expression." Perhaps it’s the effect of social media, but how Gay fared offers a contrast with how a previous Harvard president got past a storm whipped up by controversial words.