Trial Of Offences Against Children And Violation Of Child Rights-Thresiamma Varkey’s Case Creates A Catch-22 Situation
7 years, 7 months ago

Trial Of Offences Against Children And Violation Of Child Rights-Thresiamma Varkey’s Case Creates A Catch-22 Situation

Live Law  

This is a short write up on Thresiamma Varkey vs. State of Kerala, wherein a Single Bench of the High Court of Kerala issued directions to the subordinate courts in the matter of trial of offences before the Children’s Court. In the above decision, apart from the decision on the issue, the Court also formulated some directions to the subordinate courts, inter alia, directed that “no case against the children or violation of child rights, shall be committed to the Sessions Court for being tried before the Children's Court unless at least one of the offences for which the accused is being tried is punishable with imprisonment of more than seven years.” It seems this direction sans legality and out of context. Section 25 says: “For the purpose of providing speedy trial of offences against children or of violation of child rights, the State Government may, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification, specify at least a court in the State or specify, for each district, a Court of Session to be a Children's Court to try the said offences:” Section 86 of the New Act fixes the venue of trial of different types of offences committed by the ‘child in conflict with law’. So, the direction that no case against the children or violation of child rights shall be committed to the Sessions Court for being tried before the Children's Court unless at least one of the offences for which the accused is being tried is punishable with imprisonment of more than seven years, appears to be against the legislative intention. Only those kind of cases in respect of which the Commission finds "violation of child rights of a serious nature" or "contravention of provision of any law for the time being in force" and recommends to the concerned Government or authority for initiation of the proceedings for prosecution, shall be deemed to be cognizable and triable by the specified Children's Court constituted under section 25 of the Act.

History of this topic

Children's Court Meant To Try Not Just Cases Where Child Rights Are Violated But Also Juveniles To Be Tried As Adults: MP High Court
4 months ago
Supreme Court Reviews Its Order, Reiterates Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007 Are Relevant Rules For Considering Question Of Juvenility
1 year ago
Division Bench’s Directions Contrary To Principles Laid Down By Supreme Court: Madras High Court Single Judge On Custody Battle For US-Born Twins
2 years, 1 month ago
Supreme Court Notice to Centre on Plea Challenging Amendment to Juvenile Justice Act
2 years, 5 months ago
Avoid Hyper-technical Approach In Deciding Juvenility Claim; If Two Views Possible, Lean In Favour Of Accused : Supreme Court
2 years, 6 months ago
Parliamentary panel decides not to push for lowering age limit of juvenile offenders under POCSO
3 years, 7 months ago
SC Issues Guidelines for Expeditious Trial of Cases Under POCSO Act
6 years, 10 months ago
Child Rapes: SC Issues Directions For The Better Implementation Of POCSO Act [Read Judgment]
6 years, 10 months ago
Two Women Lawyers Move SC Over Safety Of School Children
7 years, 6 months ago
Two Women Lawyers Move SC Over Safety Of School Children
7 years, 6 months ago
Trial Of Offences Against Children And Violation Of Child Rights-Thresiamma Varkey’s Case Creates A Catch-22 Situation
7 years, 7 months ago
Examine Conflict Between POCSO & IPC: SC To Centre
8 years, 2 months ago
SC refuses to entertain plea against new Juvenile Justice Act
9 years ago
Supreme Court to hear the Challenge against new Juvenile Justice Act Tomorrow
9 years ago
Breaking: SC appraises that Convict was a Juvenile after 24 years of incident; demands AG's opinion regarding how to deal with him aged 40 now [Read the Order]
10 years, 4 months ago
Breaking: SC appraises that Convict was a Juvenile after 24 years of incident; demands AG's opinion regarding how to deal with him aged 40 now [Read the Order]
10 years, 4 months ago
Supreme Court urges re-examination of Juvenile Law
10 years, 8 months ago
Supreme Court urges re-examination of Juvenile Law
10 years, 8 months ago
Gang-rape victim’s parents move SC for juvenile’s trial
11 years, 3 months ago

Discover Related