
Trial Of Offences Against Children And Violation Of Child Rights-Thresiamma Varkey’s Case Creates A Catch-22 Situation
Live LawThis is a short write up on Thresiamma Varkey vs. State of Kerala, wherein a Single Bench of the High Court of Kerala issued directions to the subordinate courts in the matter of trial of offences before the Children’s Court. In the above decision, apart from the decision on the issue, the Court also formulated some directions to the subordinate courts, inter alia, directed that “no case against the children or violation of child rights, shall be committed to the Sessions Court for being tried before the Children's Court unless at least one of the offences for which the accused is being tried is punishable with imprisonment of more than seven years.” It seems this direction sans legality and out of context. Section 25 says: “For the purpose of providing speedy trial of offences against children or of violation of child rights, the State Government may, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification, specify at least a court in the State or specify, for each district, a Court of Session to be a Children's Court to try the said offences:” Section 86 of the New Act fixes the venue of trial of different types of offences committed by the ‘child in conflict with law’. So, the direction that no case against the children or violation of child rights shall be committed to the Sessions Court for being tried before the Children's Court unless at least one of the offences for which the accused is being tried is punishable with imprisonment of more than seven years, appears to be against the legislative intention. Only those kind of cases in respect of which the Commission finds "violation of child rights of a serious nature" or "contravention of provision of any law for the time being in force" and recommends to the concerned Government or authority for initiation of the proceedings for prosecution, shall be deemed to be cognizable and triable by the specified Children's Court constituted under section 25 of the Act.
History of this topic

Children's Court Meant To Try Not Just Cases Where Child Rights Are Violated But Also Juveniles To Be Tried As Adults: MP High Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Reviews Its Order, Reiterates Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007 Are Relevant Rules For Considering Question Of Juvenility
Live Law
Division Bench’s Directions Contrary To Principles Laid Down By Supreme Court: Madras High Court Single Judge On Custody Battle For US-Born Twins
Live Law
Supreme Court Notice to Centre on Plea Challenging Amendment to Juvenile Justice Act
News 18
Avoid Hyper-technical Approach In Deciding Juvenility Claim; If Two Views Possible, Lean In Favour Of Accused : Supreme Court
Live Law
Parliamentary panel decides not to push for lowering age limit of juvenile offenders under POCSO
Firstpost
SC Issues Guidelines for Expeditious Trial of Cases Under POCSO Act
Live Law![Child Rapes: SC Issues Directions For The Better Implementation Of POCSO Act [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Child Rapes: SC Issues Directions For The Better Implementation Of POCSO Act [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Two Women Lawyers Move SC Over Safety Of School Children
Live Law
Two Women Lawyers Move SC Over Safety Of School Children
Live Law
Trial Of Offences Against Children And Violation Of Child Rights-Thresiamma Varkey’s Case Creates A Catch-22 Situation
Live Law
Examine Conflict Between POCSO & IPC: SC To Centre
Live Law
SC refuses to entertain plea against new Juvenile Justice Act
Live Law
Supreme Court to hear the Challenge against new Juvenile Justice Act Tomorrow
Live Law![Breaking: SC appraises that Convict was a Juvenile after 24 years of incident; demands AG's opinion regarding how to deal with him aged 40 now [Read the Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Breaking: SC appraises that Convict was a Juvenile after 24 years of incident; demands AG's opinion regarding how to deal with him aged 40 now [Read the Order]
Live Law![Breaking: SC appraises that Convict was a Juvenile after 24 years of incident; demands AG's opinion regarding how to deal with him aged 40 now [Read the Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Breaking: SC appraises that Convict was a Juvenile after 24 years of incident; demands AG's opinion regarding how to deal with him aged 40 now [Read the Order]
Live Law
Supreme Court urges re-examination of Juvenile Law
Live Law
Supreme Court urges re-examination of Juvenile Law
Live Law
Gang-rape victim’s parents move SC for juvenile’s trial
The HinduDiscover Related










![[S.377 IPC Attempt] Crimes Against Women & Children On The Rise, Releasing Convict On Probation Will Send Wrong Message: Kerala High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)









![[NDPS Act] Not For Accused To Prove Seized Samples Were Not In Safe Custody, Burden Lies On Prosecution To Establish Safe Handling: J&K High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
![[Juvenile Justice Act] Offence Of Wilful Neglect Must Be Committed Intentionally, Not By Accident Or Inadvertence: Kerala High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)























