"Pattern Of False Implication In Chargesheet, Cooked Up Witnesses": Umar Khalid's Lawyer In Bail Hearing In Delhi Riots Larger Conspiracy Case
Live LawSeeking bail in the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case involving charges under UAPA, student activist Umar Khalid's lawyer today argued before a Delhi Court that the statements of 'cooked up witnesses' showed a pattern of 'false implication' in the chargesheet as well as FIR 59/2020.Senior Advocate Trideep Pais argued before Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat that one of the. Seeking bail in the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case involving charges under UAPA, student activist Umar Khalid's lawyer today argued before a Delhi Court that the statements of 'cooked up witnesses' showed a pattern of 'false implication' in the chargesheet as well as FIR 59/2020. Senior Advocate Trideep Pais argued before Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat that one of the witness' statements which was recorded three days prior to Umar Khalid's arrest was done in order to "suit the arrest". Pais also referred to the statement of another protected witness namely Smith and argued that his Section 164 CrPC statement was recorded three days prior to Umar Khalid's arrest in order to "suit the arrest".