Fast doesn't always mean perfect
The accused in the Delhi gang rape case are being tried in Saket's fast-track court. However, such short-term, quick-fix solutions that do not address the underlying problems plaguing the judicial system need to be carefully analysed from the access to justice point of view before we accept them. These arise when the legal system in question fails to satisfy what British legal scholar Adrian Zuckerman terms as the "three dimensions of justice", namely substantive justice-on-merits, timeliness, and proportionate use of resources. The class divide becomes particularly acute when many socio-economically disadvantaged potential litigants are unable to access the judicial system to seek redress, but are forced to engage with it as accused, at the mercy of courts. Although the SC first mooted the idea of case management in Salem Advocates Bar Association vs Union of India in 2003 and the Law Commission followed it up by releasing a Consultation Paper on case management in 2003, neither the government nor the judiciary have considered these proposals seriously.

Discover Related

Denial of speedy, timely justice disastrous to rule of law: SC

Fast-track courts face challenges in resources and efficiency

Understanding the Supreme Court’s stance on the right to a speedy trial

New criminal laws will ensure speedy justice, no more 'tarikh-pe-tarikh': Amit Shah

India's criminal justice system: An example of justice delayed, justice denied

CJI T S Thakur hopes to 'sort out' issues raised by Justice Chelameswar

Prepare roadmap to put justice delivery system on fast track: SC to Centre

Take steps to fast track criminal justice system: SC tells Centre
